Back to feed

Researcher Reconsiders School Shooting Prevention

MindShift1 min read
Image accompanying A Leading School Shootings Researcher Says He Was Wrong from MindShift

What happened

MindShift, publishing a Hechinger Report story, reported that UCLA school violence scholar Ron Avi Astor told an April American Educational Research Association audience, “We were wrong.” Astor said he had long believed improved school climate and reduced bullying would help prevent school shootings. In his AERA presentation, he contrasted declining California student weapon reports from 2001-2024 with rising national school shooting incidents.

Why it matters

For educators and designers, the practical point is not to abandon social-emotional learning, restorative justice, trauma-informed care or counseling. The story says those efforts benefited students and schools generally became safer. But Astor now argues many perpetrators seek national notoriety through media attention, so local climate work alone may not address that pathway.

What to do next

Leaders should review crisis communication and training materials for unnecessary amplification of perpetrators, manifestos or videos, while keeping victim-centered, accurate information available. Track guidance from researchers, journalists and platforms. Astor says persuading social media companies or the dark web is a “long shot,” and he cannot prove these changes would reduce shootings.

About this briefing

Reviewed by TutorFlow Editorial. We link the primary source, preserve its publication date, and distinguish reported claims from TutorFlow analysis. Our commentary focuses on practical decisions for educators and training teams.

Discussion (0)

0/1000
Loading discussion

Build with what you learned

Turn a useful idea into teaching content.

Use TutorFlow to build courses, videos, slides, tests, and interactive activities from your own materials.

Start building

Continue reading