What happened
Faculty Focus published an August 12, 2026 article by educator and author Catherine Yeziiz on using “AI Image Combine” in teaching. Yeziiz describes uploading two crayon sketches, prompting a manga-style college lecture hall scene, and using the resulting panel in a 300-level multimedia-design course. She also outlines workflows for syllabus comics, debate avatars, and 3-D prototype critique, and reports LMS access and quiz-score figures from one activity.
Why it matters
For educators and instructional designers, the article frames generative images as prompts for discussion, storyboarding, visual rhetoric, and iterative design tasks. Its most useful contribution is not a broad effectiveness claim, but a set of concrete classroom patterns that connect visuals to assessment, debate preparation, and critique activities.
What to do next
Treat the examples as instructor-reported practice, not general evidence. If piloting, use low-stakes activities with royalty-free icons, student doodles, or avatars. Document prompts and revisions, require attribution as Yeziiz suggests, and discuss output variation with skin-tone descriptors. Avoid making selfies mandatory, check local FERPA, copyright, and data rules, and remind students that AI visuals are speculative rather than evidence in research work.
About this briefing
Reviewed by TutorFlow Editorial. We link the primary source, preserve its publication date, and distinguish reported claims from TutorFlow analysis. Our commentary focuses on practical decisions for educators and training teams.
Discussion (0)
Open to everyone