What happened
eLearning Industry published an article by Alex Tkachenko arguing that training modules with equal visual weight for every topic can leave employees unclear about what matters most. The article cites Rothkopf’s 1966 American Educational Research Journal study on adjunct questions, Castel and colleagues’ 2002 Memory & Cognition study on point values in recall, and Mautone and Mayer’s 2001 Journal of Educational Psychology study on visual signaling in multimedia learning.
Why it matters
For instructional designers and L&D teams, the practical issue is prioritization, not adding more content. The cited studies, as described in the article, associate cues, value markers, arrows, color highlights, and summaries with more selective attention, recall, or transfer. If every policy, step, or concept is formatted identically, learners may have to infer priority for themselves.
What to do next
Before building or revising a module, rank topics as must-know, should-know, or nice-to-know, and reserve consistent signals for the highest-priority items. Use prompts or reflection questions after critical material, and assess whether learners can identify what mattered most. Treat the article’s workplace examples as illustrative, because the evidence provided does not establish results for every training context.
About this briefing
Reviewed by TutorFlow Editorial. We link the primary source, preserve its publication date, and distinguish reported claims from TutorFlow analysis. Our commentary focuses on practical decisions for educators and training teams.
Discussion (0)
Open to everyone