What happened
The Learning Guild published Cally Mervine Kiser’s field guide for reviewing eLearning screens for extraneous cognitive load. Kiser says conventional quality checklists can confirm objectives, assessments, narration, navigation, and accessibility while missing whether presentation makes content harder to learn. Her proposed one-page audit uses four multimedia learning principles: coherence, signaling, redundancy, and segmenting.
Why it matters
For instructional designers and L&D teams, the article reframes quality review as more than content accuracy and alignment. Kiser cites a 2022 review of reviews covering 29 systematic reviews, 1,189 studies, and more than 78,000 participants to support the four principles. She also cites a 2024 study finding neurodivergent learners reported significantly higher extraneous cognitive load than neurotypical learners in online learning environments when content difficulty was identical.
What to do next
Use the checklist as a focused design audit, not as a replacement for accessibility, assessment, or performance reviews. Review screens one at a time for irrelevant elements, unclear structure, duplicated narration and text, and pacing that limits learner control. Prioritize low-scoring screens, but treat scores as diagnostic evidence and check revisions against learner feedback, accessibility requirements, and the training outcomes you are responsible for improving.
About this briefing
Reviewed by TutorFlow Editorial. We link the primary source, preserve its publication date, and distinguish reported claims from TutorFlow analysis. Our commentary focuses on practical decisions for educators and training teams.
Discussion (0)
Open to everyone